Observational study examines eruption variables in mandibular third molars, suggesting linear metrics may better predict retention risk.
Background The mandibular third molars are the most frequently impacted teeth, followed by their maxillary counterparts and the upper canines. Their retention is influenced by several anatomical and developmental factors, including limited retromolar space, unfavorable angulation, and eruption trajectory—each critical for proper emergence. Objective This study examines the association between the eruption or impaction of mandibular third molars and variables such as eruption space, transpalatal width, and eruption angulation. Materials and methods Seventy-one mandibular third molars were evaluated using 31 jaw models and 31 orthopantomograms (OPGs). Transpalatal width was measured linearly on the models, while angular data concerning eruption space and direction were derived from the OPGs. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (v.25). Results Retention was observed in 12.9% of cases. Linear assessments indicated that 51% of the molars were at risk of impaction, contingent on their angulation. Conclusions Maxillary constriction significantly increases the risk of mandibular third molar retention. Linear measurements proved more reliable than angular metrics in estimating eruption space. Thus, for diagnosing transverse maxillary discrepancies, linear transpalatal width measurements are preferred over non-metric evaluations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Contreras-Madrid et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: