ABSTRACT The purpose of this study is to apply an accountability model to systematically review the biodiversity accounting research published in accounting journals over the last 23 years (2002–2024). An instrument containing a list of questions and sub‐questions addressing four steps of an accountability model—why to report, to whom to report, what to report, and how to report—was developed to systematically review the biodiversity literature with the help of 14 biodiversity experts. A final sample of 98 articles published within 23 accounting journals was reviewed to investigate the accountability focus embodied within the biodiversity accounting literature. In addition to providing useful insights to users, managers, preparers, regulators, and standard‐setters, this study makes a valuable contribution to accounting research by identifying and addressing important gaps in the literature—and therefore important research avenues—with respect to important issues associated with organisational accountability for biodiversity.
Eluyela et al. (2025) studied this question.