PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Applied Sciences5 citationsOpen Access

CFD Analysis of Transition Models for Low-Reynolds Number Aerodynamics

View Full Paper
EGEnrico GiacominiLWLars G. Westerberg

Key Points

  • The γ–Reθ turbulence model shows the best performance in predicting lift and drag errors for low Reynolds number flows.
  • Lift and drag errors for the γ–Reθ model are below 0.17 and 0.04 respectively, indicating high accuracy compared to other models.
  • CFD simulations analyzed the aerodynamic performance of a cambered plate at a Reynolds number of 10,000.
  • Results suggest the γ–Reθ model is the most suitable turbulence model for transitional flow simulations in low Reynolds number conditions.

Abstract

Low Reynolds number flows are central to the performance of airfoils used in small unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), micro air vehicles (MAVs), and aerodynamic platforms operating in rarefied atmospheres. Consequently, a deep understanding of airfoil behavior and accurate prediction of aerodynamic performance are essential for the optimal design of such systems. The present study employs Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations to analyze the aerodynamic performance of a cambered plate at a Reynolds number of 10,000. Two Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) turbulence models, γ–Reθ and k-kL-ω, are utilized, along with the Unsteady Navier–Stokes (UNS) equations. The simulation results are compared against experimental data, with a focus on lift, drag, and pressure coefficients. The models studied perform moderately well at small angles of attack. The γ–Reθ model yields the lowest lift and drag errors (below 0.17 and 0.04, respectively), while the other models show significantly higher discrepancies, particularly in lift prediction. The γ–Reθ model demonstrates good overall accuracy, with notable deviation only in the prediction of the stall angle. In contrast, the k-kL-ω model and the UNS equations capture the general flow trend up to stall but fail to provide reliable predictions beyond that point. These findings indicate that the γ–Reθ model is the most suitable among those tested for low Reynolds number transitional flow simulations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Giacomini et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d473a631b076d99fa6be62https://doi.org/10.3390/app151810299
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper