This multicenter trial investigates safety and efficacy of robotic verticalization in patients with acquired brain injury, comparing it to traditional methods.
Background: Upright position recovery (i.e., verticalization) is crucial in the rehabilitation of severe acquired brain injury (sABI). VErticalization by tilt table equipped with robotic-assisted lower limbs cyclic Mobilization (VEM) may facilitate a safer adaptation to vertical posture, reducing orthostatic hypotension occurrence. This multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) aims at investigating efficacy, safety, and usability of VEM compared to Traditional Verticalization (TV) using a conventional tilt table in cognitive-motor rehabilitation of sABI patients; Methods: a total of 118 sABI patients with or emerged from prolonged Disorder of Consciousness (pDoC and eDoC) will be enrolled in six post-acute Neurorehabilitation Units and randomly allocated to VEM or TV arm (for each arm: total 25 sessions of 30 min daily treatment/5 days/week/5 weeks). Patients will undergo clinical–functional assessment, resting EEG recording and blood sampling, before, at the end of treatment, and after 1 month; Results: we will expect possible differences in safety and usability of verticalization between VEM and TV rehabilitative intervention and in their efficacy to improve clinical–functional findings and brain indices; Conclusions: this RCT will provide new insights for the intensive, tailored and safe neurorehabilitation intervention in patients with sABI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Estraneo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: