Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study reveals that a personalized experiential virtual reality system improves learning achievement and engagement in history education.
This study investigated the comparative effectiveness of a Personalized Experiential Virtual Reality (PE-VR) system and a Normal Virtual Reality (NVR) system in enhancing undergraduate students’ learning achievement and engagement. A total of 30 undergraduate students participated in the experiment. Learning achievement was assessed using pre- and post-tests and analyzed with ANCOVA, while engagement was evaluated with a standardized questionnaire and analyzed using ANOVA. After controlling for pre-test scores, the results indicated that students in the PE-VR condition achieved significantly higher post-test scores than those in the NVR condition (Mean Difference = 15.522, p=0.001). Students in the PE-VR condition also demonstrated significantly higher levels of engagement than their counterparts in the NVR condition (Mean Difference = 17.533, p=0.001). These findings offer empirical evidence that the PE-VR system can overcome the limitations of traditional instruction and enhance history education in higher education settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: