PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Pure and Applied Chemistry2 citations

Combining molecular fragmentation and machine learning for accurate prediction of adiabatic ionization potentials

View Full Paper
DSDebashis SwainIndiana University BloomingtonSMSarah MaierIndiana University BloomingtonSMSurya Sekhar MannaIndiana University Bloomington

Key Points

  • The Delta-Machine Learning model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.02 eV for ionization potentials.
  • Systematic error cancellation was observed through the use of electron population difference maps.
  • The model outperformed traditional DFT in accuracy while being less sensitive to functional choices.
  • Connectivity-Based Hierarchy fragments enhanced the model's ability to account for electronic changes.

Abstract

Abstract Accurate wavefunction methods like CCSD(T) can predict chemical and thermodynamic properties of small molecules with near-experimental precision. However, their steep computational cost limits their use for large systems or extensive datasets. In contrast, DFT is faster and more practical for large molecules but often fails to accurately capture electronic changes, especially upon geometry relaxation. To address this, we have developed a graph neural network (GNN)-based Delta-Machine Learning (ΔML) model using Connectivity-Based Hierarchy (CBH-2) molecular fragments as descriptors to predict adiabatic ionization potentials (IPs). Our approach shows systematic error cancellation, guided by electron population difference maps to identify ionization sites within the molecule to construct CBH-2 fragments. We have considered both structural and electronic features to improve our ΔML model. We have observed that upon incorporation of electronic features, the graph-based ΔML model achieved a coupled cluster level of accuracy with an MAE of 0.02 eV for IP prediction. Furthermore, we compared adiabatic and vertical IP predictions across different methods. While raw DFT errors are strongly dependent on the functional used, our ΔML model is robust and much less functional-sensitive.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Swain et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d473ad31b076d99fa6c539https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2025-0574
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper