Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Framework reveals machine learning predicts effective additives, enhancing halogenation in fluorinated compounds.
Highly fluorinated aromatic compounds exhibit unique electronic structures, however their selective transformation remains a longstanding challenge. Halogenation of F7 naphthalene previously required low temperatures (–40 to 0 °C) for high yields, while room-temperature reactions suffered from side reactions and decomposition. Here we present a data- guided framework for rational additive design enabling efficient halogenation under ambient conditions. Screening 25 functional additives revealed distinct groups, with effective ones affording halogenated products in yields above 50% and recovering in high rates. Machine learning models built from DFT-derived descriptors achieved strong predictive performance (R2 = 0.90, RMSE = 10.9). Feature importance and SHAP analyses clarified the design criteria—moderately balanced functional-group charges and non-negative aromatic contributions—as critical for reactivity. Guided by these criteria, a chlorine-substituted additive, 1-chloro-4-(ethoxymethyl)benzene (3a), was designed, predicted to give >99% yield, and experimentally validated to deliver iodinated product in 98% yield with 96% additive recovery at room temperature. Moreover, additive 3a was effective in iodination, bromination, and chlorination, demonstrating the generality of the design principle. This study advances additive development from empirical trial-and-error to a predictive, machine learning– enabled strategy, offering guidelines for selective transformations of perfluorinated arenes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohtsuka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: