This review integrates theories on kin selection and inclusive-fitness in plants, emphasizing sibling rivalry and maternal strategies.
Darwin’s early puzzlement about sterile castes helped catalyse inclusive-fitness theory and kin selection, providing a genetic framework for the evolution of helping behaviours. This review integrates theoretical models and empirical studies that apply inclusive-fitness logic to plant reproductive strategies, concentrating on sibling rivalry, maternal counter-strategies (polyembryony, endosperm function, locule architecture), and kin recognition mediated by root exudates and light-quality cues. Studies show how parent–offspring conflict predicts divergent optima for per-seed investment and brood size and how maternal mechanisms can compensate for or mitigate damaging within-fruit competition. We highlight methodological limitations of controlled studies, including Jensen’s inequality and the ecological differences between artificial substrates and natural soils, and recommend mechanism-focused approaches such as exudate exposure assays and molecular profiling. Finally, we explore agronomic implications, arguing that inclusive-fitness perspectives can inform breeding for cooperative ideotypes and the design of varietal mixtures, while emphasizing that field validation is essential. Overall, inclusive-fitness theory provides a powerful interpretive and predictive toolkit for plant evolutionary biology and sustainable agriculture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rath et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: