This paper demonstrates a velocity profile correction and uncertainty evaluation in an ultrasonic clamp-on meter, highlighting measurement rigor.
Most flow metering methods used in industrial applications produce results sensitive to the local velocity profile. In response, manufacturers often implement correction algorithms; however, these are rarely supported by rigorous uncertainty evaluations. This paper presents a Reynolds number-dependent velocity profile correction, applicable under fully developed flow conditions and for the Reynolds-dependent part of the correction in disturbed flows, demonstrated on an example of an ultrasonic clamp-on flow meter. Measurement uncertainties are evaluated and propagated through a regression model using Monte Carlo simulation, in compliance with the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). Special care is taken to assess the validity range and impact of assuming fully developed flow conditions in the test rig. A validation case demonstrates the reliability of the correction algorithm and its associated uncertainty within the tested conditions. The proposed approach is applicable to other meter types and can be extended to corrections for specific flow disturbances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Straka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: