PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Medical Physics6 citationsOpen Access

Comprehensive characterization and validation of a fast‐resolving (1000 Hz) plastic scintillator for ultra‐high dose rate electron dosimetry

View Full Paper
LGLixiang GuoBZBanghao ZhouYTYi‐Chun Tsai

Key Points

  • The scintillator system demonstrated high accuracy, remaining within 0.5% of ion chamber measurements across doses of 0.1–35 Gy.
  • For ultra-high dose rate irradiation, the scintillator achieved less than 3% dose error compared to film measurements, validating its reliability.
  • The calibration of the scintillator accounts for radiation degradation, providing millisecond-resolved inter-pulse measurements for electron beams.
  • With minimal dependence on beam parameters, the scintillator is positioned as a suitable detector for FLASH radiotherapy research.

Abstract

Abstract Background The normal tissue sparing effect of ultra‐high dose rate irradiation (≥40 Gy/s, UHDR), as compared to conventional dose rate (CONV), has attracted significant research interest for FLASH radiotherapy (RT). Accurate, dose rate independent, fast‐responding dosimeters capable of resolving the spatiotemporal characteristics of UHDR beams are urgently needed to facilitate FLASH research and support its clinical translation. Tissue‐equivalent scintillators, with millimeter‐level spatial resolution and millisecond‐level temporal resolution, possess these required characteristics and show strong potential for use in UHDR dosimetry. Purpose We investigated the performance of the HYPERSCINT RP‐FLASH scintillator system at up to 1000 Hz sampling frequency ( f s ) for UHDR electron beam dosimetry. Methods The scintillator was exposed to CONV and UHDR electron irradiation using a LINAC‐based FLASH platform. Its spectral characteristics were delineated with a four‐component calibration, followed by a signal‐to‐dose calibration using 18 MeV CONV electron beam. The dose linearity and dosimetric accuracy in response to CONV and UHDR irradiation at 1 and 1000 Hz f s were quantified against ion chamber and EBT‐XD film measurements. The response of the scintillator system was investigated as a function of beam energy (6 and 18 MeV), field size (2 × 2 to 25 × 25 cm 2 ), dose per pulse (DPP, 0.8–2.3 Gy/pulse), and pulse repetition frequency (PRF, 30–180 Hz). Relative signal sensitivity was quantified against accumulated dose to account for the scintillator's radiation degradation. Pulse‐resolved dose measurements at 18 MeV UHDR, obtained using the scintillator with 1000 Hz f s for a train of 10 pulses at 180 Hz PRF, were validated with a PMT‐fiber optic scattered radiation detector. Results The scintillator system at 1 Hz f s demonstrated high accuracy in dose measurements, remaining within 0.5% of ion chamber measurements over the dose range of 0.1–35 Gy under CONV irradiation. For the UHDR irradiation, the scintillator showed <3% dose error compared to film measurements up to 40 Gy at 1000 Hz f s . Its response was found to be minimally dependent on energy, field size, and PRF. The scintillator under‐responded by ∼4% over the 0.8–2.3 Gy/pulse range, although the dose difference relative to film remained within 2%. The radiation degradation of the scintillation detector followed a 2 nd ‐order polynomial fit between 0 and 10 kGy, and a linear fit with a slope of −2.6%/kGy in the range of 0–2 kGy. The pulse‐resolved dose measured by the scintillator was verified to be within 3% accuracy when compared to the measurements obtained using the PMT‐fiber optic detector. Conclusions With routine dose calibration to account for radiation induced degradation, the fast‐responding scintillator system can accurately provide millisecond‐resolved inter‐pulse measurements for electron beams at conventional and ultra‐high dose rates, with minimal dependence on beam parameters. This suggests that the HYPERSCINT RP‐FLASH scintillator system could serve as a detector of choice for electron FLASH research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d473bb31b076d99fa6c90ahttps://doi.org/10.1002/mp.70006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper