This analysis uncovers how artificial general intelligence resembles living organisms, suggesting implications for resource consumption and replication.
In the search for approaches to Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), I began to see an analogy with living organisms. In biology, DNA is not a static archive but an instruction to assemble a human being, a biochemical recipe executed molecule by molecule. Viruses need even less: only RNA or DNA, which on their own are not alive but 'come to life' when they enter a cell and access resources. By extension, AGI can be viewed as a digital organism with a minimal 'code of everything' a form of digital DNA. Outside its environment, this code is just a digital unit, but within computational infrastructures it unfolds into a full system. This code does not store all knowledge directly; it encodes rules for reaching ontologies, loading modules, and assembling intelligence. Tasks activate different 'genes,' similar to epigenetic switching in cells. This view raises practical questions: how AGI will consume resources, how it might replicate safely, and what digital ecology will sustain it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yevheniia Babenko (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: