Conceptual framework demonstrates how complexity theory informs sustainability transformations, suggesting new adaptive spaces and fostering collective agency.
This paper develops a conceptual framework for integrating complexity theory into systemic policy design for sustainability transformations (ST). We conceptualize ST as a dynamic design challenge requiring enabling conditions—relational, cognitive, and institutional—rather than predetermined solutions. The framework operates across three levels: at the macro-level, sustainability trajectories are framed as attractor landscapes; at the meso-level, adaptive spaces enable experimentation beyond dominant institutional constraints; and at the micro-level, self-organizing collective agency drives transformative action. Central generative mechanisms, particularly sensemaking and sensegiving, facilitate the imagination of emergent opportunities, navigation of uncertainty, and mobilization of collective responses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jalonen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: