PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 23, 2025Frontiers in Genome Editing8 citationsOpen Access

Consumer choices regarding genome-edited food crops: lessons from Japan

View Full Paper
TITetsuya Ishii

Key Points

  • Consumer acceptance of genome-edited food crops is limited, with only one approved crop available online for purchase.
  • Perceptions of safety and usefulness drive consumer choices, yet many individuals remain largely unaware of genome editing.
  • Advocacy for mandatory labeling underscores safety concerns and the need for better consumer education on these products.
  • Improving consumer awareness will require effective risk communication and clear labeling, alongside societal engagement efforts.

Abstract

Japan has rapidly deregulated certain types of agricultural genome editing, yet the societal integration of these products warrants further investigation. This paper analyzed the sale and people’s perception of genome-edited food crops in Japan after reviewing the regulatory framework. Of four genome-edited crops approved as non-genetically modified organism, only one is sold online to consumers who credit safety information and perceive usefulness. Some consumers express deep safety concern, advocating mandatory labeling. The majority of people are not sufficiently aware of genome editing. To enhance informed consumer choices of genome-edited food crops, it is crucial to share visions in society, hold risk communication for mutual understanding, and maintain clear labels, including organic food standards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tetsuya Ishii (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d4758931b076d99fa6d1f5https://doi.org/10.3389/fgeed.2025.1672358
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper