Analysis reveals gaps in contextualization and intervention focus in digital health strategies, highlighting key challenges in planning.
Abstract Digital health strategies are increasingly being adopted in Africa, but their consistency with best practice planning is poorly documented. All 54 countries were screened; 48 had a plan in the Global Digital Health Monitor, and 11 recent plans met the inclusion criteria. Using the “Ready, Extract, Analyze, Distill” tool methodology and a customized grid merging the Walt-Gilson policy triangle with WHO/ITU standards, we compared four dimensions: context, content, priority actions, and emerging technologies. Only one strategy reported complete socio-economic and health data; more than half of the strategies did not provide the challenges facing health systems; and there were recurring gaps in the pillars relating to workforce, legal frameworks, financing, and interoperability. Most visions cited universal health coverage (8/11) and quality of care (7/11), but objectives followed three disparate logics for achieving their vision. Of 148 planned digital health interventions, 45 % target providers, and just 7 % clients; linkages between interventions and stated health system challenges are often weak. None of the plans explicitly provides for the integration of emerging technologies or locally adapted innovations. These findings have highlighted weaknesses in contextualization, challenge-based planning, and innovation in strategies; set priorities for the next review of these plans, and increase the expected outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sylla et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: