Observational study assesses clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of DMARDs in RA patients, highlighting adherence and socioeconomic influences.
Background. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, progressive inflammatory disease that imposes a significant clinical and economic burden, particularly in resource-limited settings. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are the cornerstone of RA management, yet data on their cost-effectiveness in real-world Indian populations remain limited. Objectives. To evaluate the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of various DMARD regimens in a real-world Indian cohort and assess the influence of treatment adherence, functional disability, and socioeconomic factors. Methods. This prospective observational study enrolled 185 RA patients at a tertiary care hospital in Southern India between September 2023 and May 2024. Disease activity was assessed using the Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS-28), functional disability with the Indian Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and adherence with the Compliance Questionnaire for Rheumatology-5 (CQR-5). Direct medical costs were calculated from the patient perspective, and average cost-effectiveness ratios (ACERs) were determined for each regimen. Results. The cohort was predominantly female (90.8%) with a mean age of 50.4 ± 11.8 years. Methotrexate was the most prescribed and least expensive DMARD (INR 2,567 [$30] per 3 months), while leflunomide–tofacitinib was the most costly (INR 11,367 [$134]). The triple regimen of methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and tofacitinib was the most cost-effective. High adherence (≥80%) was seen in 92% of patients and correlated with improved DAS-28 scores. Socioeconomic disparities were linked to baseline disease severity. Conclusions. In this resource-limited setting, optimized DMARD therapy, particularly a novel triple-drug combination, can be a cost-effective strategy for improving RA outcomes. High patient adherence is critical for success, underscoring the need for policy interventions to ensure equitable access to effective treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chettri et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: