This research reveals bolt support improves rock stability and control in mining roadways, suggesting effective design principles.
In order to determine appropriate anchoring parameters after enlarging the cross-section of the mining roadway, a comprehensive study was conducted to investigate the development of deformation and failure characteristics in the surrounding rock. The mechanical behavior of rock failure under high-stress conditions and the progressive evolution of deformation and failure from shallow to deep zones were thoroughly analyzed. It was proposed that the primary function of bolt support in mining roadways is to guide the surrounding rock to form a stable compressive arch or ring structure. The mechanical mechanism underlying the formation of such an arch under bolt guidance, along with the stability characteristics during this process, was investigated. The principles for determining bolt support parameters were established as follows: (a) ensuring the formation of a closed compressive ring within the anchorage zone around the roadway; (b) preventing shear failure at the roadway corners; and (c) controlling the extent of roof subsidence under gravitational loading. Design methodologies for determining rock bolt and anchor cable length and spacing were formulated and implemented in the support design of large-section mining roadways within million-ton fully mechanized mining faces. The cross-sectional dimensions of the supported roadway are 5.8 × 4.0 m. Field monitoring results indicate that, after stabilization of the surrounding rock deformation, the maximum convergence between both sides does not exceed 140 mm, the maximum roof subsidence remains below 40 mm, and the maximum roof separation is limited to within 4 mm. These findings provide strong evidence that the selected design parameters fully meet the engineering requirements for roadway support.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: