Qualitative analysis examines how accreditation automation enhances education quality in madrasah, suggesting improvements in efficiency.
This research aims to dissect the process, implementation and impact of accreditation automation on the quality of education, especially in madrasah. The research method uses a qualitative research type with a library research approach. Data analysis techniques include summarisation, presentation, conclusion drawing, or verification. The results showed that several things must be passed in accreditation in Madrasahs in the form of Determination of School/madrasah Targets, Socialisation and delivery of accreditation tools, Filling and Submitting Accreditation Instruments, Determination of School/Madrasah Eligibility and Assignment of Assessors, Visitation to Schools/Madrasahs, Validation of the Process and Results of Visitation. Assessors who have completed the visitation provide a report to BAP-S/M. The visitation report needs to be validated to ensure the process and results of accreditation are credible and accountable, Verification of Validation Results and Preparation of Recommendations, Determination of Accreditation Results and Recommendations, Issuance and Delivery of Accreditation Certificates, Socialisation of Accreditation Results. Implementation of accreditation automation in the madrasah can be done through Dasbord BAN-S/M by updating madrasah secondary data and continuing by applying for accreditation on the SISPENA web. Accreditation automation has a positive impact on the efficiency of the accreditation process, improving data quality, transparency and accountability. Some risks that need to be considered from accreditation automation are data dependency, lack of direct interaction, and potential system errors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khudin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: