Critique evaluates forest taxation proposals by Matthews, suggesting changes linked to existing taxation practices.
The forest-taxation proposals of Matthews are critically discussed from the viewpoint of principles developed in the Forest Service studies of this subject. The workability of these proposals is questioned. It is suggested that the best chance of progress in forest taxation is to hinge desired changes on to existing taxation practices and concepts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robin Hall (1938) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: