Retraction reveals image reuse without attribution in failure analysis study, indicating ethical concerns.
This article has been retracted by IOP Publishing following an allegation that the work used three images from A V Guimaraes et al [1] without attribution. IOP Publishing has investigated in line with the COPE guidelines, and agrees that the following figures have been reused from A V Guimaraes et al without attribution: Figure 10 (Figure 8 in A V Guimaraes et al) Figure 11 (Figure 5 in A V Guimaraes et al) Figure 12 (Figure 6 in A V Guimaraes et al) Figure 13 (Figure 7 in A V Guimaraes et al) The evidence gathered by IOP Publishing to date, combined with the lack of author response, considerably reduces confidence in the work to the extent that IOP Publishing has made the decision to retract the work. We would welcome receiving their account of events. IOP Publishing wishes to credit the anonymous whistleblower for bringing the issue to our attention. The authors have not agreed or disagreed to this retraction and we would welcome their version of events. References [1] A V Guimaraes, P C Brasileiro, G C Giovanni, L R O Costa, L S Araujo, Failure analysis of a half-shaft of a formula SAE racing car, Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis, Volume 7, 2016, Pages 17-23 Retraction published: 18 Sept 2025
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2021 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: