Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal trajectory of very preterm infants shows predictive value of assessment at 2 years, indicating implications for routine follow-up.
Aim We aimed to assess a longitudinal trajectory of very preterm infants from corrected 1–5 years and examined how well performances on the Bayley Scales of Infant and (Toddler) Development (BSI(T)D) at 1 and 2 years predict cognitive outcome at preschool age. Methods From 2011 to 2018, 499 very preterm infants admitted to the Medical University of Innsbruck were assessed. Cognitive outcomes at 1 and 2 years were measured with BSID‐II/BSITD‐III, and at 5 years, full scale intelligence quotient (IQ) was evaluated. Results Of the 499 infants, 345 (69.1%) completed assessments at all three time points. Most had normal cognitive outcomes: 92.2% at 1 year, 80.3% at 2 years and 80.9% at 5 years. The 2‐year assessment demonstrated a stronger predictive value than the 1‐year assessment, both for identifying cognitive delay at 5 years (< 85 points; AUC 0.88 vs. 0.77) and for predicting full‐scale IQ scores in linear regression models ( R 2 = 46% vs. 36%). Conclusion The 1‐year assessment had limited predictive value, whereas the 2‐year assessment more effectively predicted preschool cognitive outcomes. A combination of BSITD at 1 and 2 years gave the best prediction at preschool age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gande et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: