Empirical analysis reveals PB-ROE dynamics and irrational trading in the Chinese retail market, suggesting new valuation approaches.
The current paper is an empirical investigation into the PB-ROE connection and event-related dynamics related to valuation in the Chinese retail industry based upon 2021-2025 samples of 10 A-listed firms (five leaders, five distressed). The results indicate an impressive dichotomy: the correlation between PB and ROE is high and positive among leaders (r=0.68), which reflects the traditional theory of valuation; in case of distressed firm, however, the correlation is negative and significant (r=-0.29) due to speculative distortion. Negative episodes cause 4x bigger PB drops in troubled companies ( -12.7 % vs. leaders -3.2 %), whereas false-positive (e.g., unconfirmed restructurings) events induce temporary bubbles, as could be the case with Dalian Friendship (the firm has a 73% PB rise/fall). Importantly, there is critical compatibility between leaders and semi-strong market efficiency as distressed firms are shown noise trader dominance, which disapproves the assumptions of EMH. We will suggest the use of the Event-Adjusted Valuation Model (EAVM) of event authenticity, intensity, and persistence in correcting the emerging-market mispricing that will give a guide to the investors not to fall into speculative trappings in fragile institutions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yujie Huang (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: