Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychometric properties of the Brief Parental Burnout Scale assessed in 150 healthcare professionals, indicating strong validity and reliability.
Objective: The present study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Brief Parental Burnout Scale (BPBSTR) in a sample of healthcare professionals. Methods: Participants completed a series of validated measures during face-to-face interviews, including the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI), the Kessler-10 Psychological Distress Scale (K10), and the Brief Psychological Resilience Scale (BPRS). Results: This study involved 150 Turkish healthcare professionals, of whom 72.0% were mothers. The mean age was 41.21 years (SD =6.81). All participants had children living with them permanently, with the number of children ranging from one to three. The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the unidimensionality of the BPBS-TR (χ²/df = 7.189/5 (p = .207), RMSEA = .054, SRMR = .025, GFI = .998, CFI= .997, and TLI = .994). BPBS-TR scores were positively related to CBI scores (rs = .403, p <.001) and K10 scores (rs = .513, p <.001). Conversely, BPBS-TR scores were negatively associated with BPRS scores (rs = –.204, p = .012). The reliability of the scale was satisfactory, with Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s omega recorded at .826 and .828, respectively. The ordinal alpha was determined to be .922, with Guttman\'s lambda-2 at .829. Additionally, item-rest correlations varied from .557 to .689. Conclusion: The current findings confirm that the BPBS-TR is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing parental burnout in a Turkish cohort of healthcare professionals. Further research in diverse populations is warranted to corroborate these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akdağ et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: