Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective analysis shows comparable pain control in dental procedures with intraosseous anesthesia, suggesting it as an alternative to IANB.
Background/Objectives: The inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is widely used for dental anesthesia; however, issues such as anatomical variation and inflammation can hinder effective pain control. Alternatives have been studied primarily in irreversible pulpitis, with limited data available for other procedures. Methods: In a retrospective analysis, data from 85 patients who underwent implantation, root resection, or osteotomy using QuickSleeper® intraosseous anesthesia (IO), infiltration (INF), or IANB were assessed. Results: IO, IANB, and INF produced similar pain levels during administration, procedure, and recovery; blood pressure and heart rate were comparable. IO and INF led to less lip numbness after 15 minutes and required less anesthetic. IO had a significantly shorter latency than IANB, allowing earlier surgery. Conclusions: Computer-guided IO is a viable alternative to IANB for implantation, root resection, and osteotomy, offering equal pain control, shorter latency, earlier surgery, and reduced injection volume.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nilius et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: