PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 20250 citationsOpen Access

Prospects for EMRI/MBH parameter estimation using Quasi-Periodic Eruption timings: short-timescale analysis

View Full Paper
JCJoheen ChakrabortyMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyLDLisa V. DrummondAustralian Research CouncilMBMatteo BonettiBrera Astronomical Observatory

Key Points

  • Mild-eccentricity EMRIs can constrain MBH mass to the 10% level within tens of orbital periods.
  • Inference framework QPE-FIT assesses QPE timings to explore astrophysical parameter constraints.
  • Kerr geodesics help resolve trajectories of secondary objects in EMRI scenarios effectively.
  • Introducing a misaligned precessing disk generally degrades the inference of EMRI orbital parameters.

Abstract

Quasi-Periodic Eruptions (QPEs) are luminous, recurring X-ray outbursts from galactic nuclei, with timescales of hours to days. While their origin remains uncertain, leading models invoke accretion disk instabilities or the interaction of a massive black hole (MBH) with a lower-mass secondary in an extreme mass ratio inspiral (EMRI). EMRI scenarios offer a robust framework for interpreting QPEs by characterizing observational signatures associated with the secondary's orbital dynamics. This, in turn, enables extraction of the MBH/EMRI physical properties and provides a means to test the EMRI scenario, distinguishing models and addressing the question: what can QPE timings teach us about massive black holes and EMRIs? In this study, we employ analytic expressions for Kerr geodesics to efficiently resolve the trajectory of the secondary object and perform GPU-accelerated Bayesian inference to assess the information content of QPE timings. Using our inference framework, referred to as QPE-FIT (Fast Inference with Timing), we explore QPE timing constraints on astrophysical parameters, such as EMRI orbital parameters and MBH mass/spin. We find that mild-eccentricity EMRIs (e0. 1-0. 3) can constrain MBH mass and EMRI semimajor axis/eccentricity to the 10% level within tens of orbital periods, while MBH spin is unconstrained for the explored semimajor axes 100Rg and monitoring baselines O (10-100) orbits. Introducing a misaligned precessing disk generally degrades inference of EMRI orbital parameters, but can constrain disk precession properties within 10-50%. This work both highlights the prospect of QPE observations as dynamical probes of galactic nuclei and outlines the challenge of doing so in the multimodal parameter space of EMRI-disk collisions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Chakraborty et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6d82e8b2b6861e4c3e0a2https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2508.20162
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Testing EMRI Models for Quasi-periodic Eruptions with 3.5 yr of Monitoring eRO-QPE12024 · 21 citations
  2. 2Testing EMRI models for Quasi-Periodic Eruptions with 3.5 years of monitoring eRO-QPE12024 · 2 citations
  3. 3Even a Precessing Clock Is Right Twice per Orbit—The Superperiods of eRO-QPE2 and Challenges for Quasiperiodic Eruption Orbital Models2026
  4. 4Repeating nuclear transients as candidate electromagnetic counterparts of LISA extreme mass ratio inspirals2024 · 4 citations
  5. 5Gravitational-wave Signatures of Quasiperiodic Eruptions: LISA Detection Prospects for RX J1301.9+27472026