This technique reduces catheter migration in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts, suggesting enhanced stability.
Abstract Background Ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPS) remain the standard of care for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion in hydrocephalus and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Despite their efficacy, they carry a notable risk of complications, particularly distal catheter migration, which can result in repeated revisions and increased morbidity. This paper describes a novel laparoscopic mesh anchoring technique aimed at preventing recurrent distal peritoneal catheter migration. Methods Three patients with recurrent distal catheter migration, two with IIH and one with hydrocephalus secondary to residual intraventricular tumour, underwent laparoscopic revision. All patients had a high body mass index (BMI) > 40 and multiple prior shunt revisions. The surgical technique involved externalising the distal catheter, confirming CSF flow, and threading the catheter through a Parietex composite mesh patch in a zigzag pattern. The mesh-catheter construct was introduced laparoscopically into the peritoneal cavity and anchored to the abdominal wall with tacks under direct visual guidance. Results Postoperative follow-up showed no further catheter migration or shunt malfunction in any of the three cases. Neurological and visual symptoms resolved or improved, and imaging demonstrated stable shunt function without new complications. No mesh-related infections or adverse events were observed during this follow-up period. Conclusion Laparoscopic surgical mesh anchoring appears to be a safe and effective technique for preventing recurrent distal catheter migration in VPS, particularly in high-risk populations such as patients with obesity. By securing the catheter to the abdominal wall with a mesh scaffold, this approach provides enhanced mechanical stability and reduces the need for repeated revisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dahiya et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: