PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Water Practice & Technology2 citationsOpen Access

Machine learning for dissolved oxygen prediction in the Manawatu River catchment, New Zealand

View Full Paper
ITI.T. TenebeEBEunice O. BabatundeNONkpa Ogarekpe

Key Points

  • Machine learning models effectively predict dissolved oxygen, improving monitoring efficiency.
  • Model performance showed R2 values greater than 0.95, indicating high accuracy with fewer indicators.
  • Regression models outperformed Bagging and Boosting techniques in predicting water quality metrics.
  • Data were analyzed from three sites in the Manawatu catchment, covering a 25-year period.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Uncontrolled anthropogenic activities have increased river pollution, resulting in poor water quality and a growing need for continuous monitoring, which is time-consuming and costly. This study evaluated the accuracy of machine learning (ML) models in predicting dissolved oxygen (DO) levels, aiming to reduce field monitoring efforts and minimize the number of measured parameters. Regression models (Huber, Linear, Ridge), Bagging methods (Extra Trees, Random Forest, Decision Trees), and Boosting techniques (Gradient Boosting, Light Gradient Boosting, AdaBoost) were tested using data from three sites in the Manawatu Catchment, New Zealand. Data spanning 1989–2014 included 12 water quality variables and was split into 70% training and 30% testing sets. Model performance was assessed using Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, root mean square error, and coefficient of determination (R2). Results showed that fewer water quality indicators, particularly temperature, pH, and nutrients, effectively predict DO. All three regression models offer the best value for predicting DO within the Manawatu catchment over Bagging and Boosting regressors with R2 0.95. This study presents a novel, data-driven approach to water quality monitoring, demonstrating that ML can accurately predict DO using a reduced set of indicators, making monitoring efforts more computationally efficient, labor-saving, and cost-effective for water resource managers.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tenebe et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6d8548b2b6861e4c3e484https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2025.124
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper