Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores how perceiving migration as a security threat affects national interests and collective identity.
In modern international relations, security issues are closely interrelated with the migration agenda. Securitiza-tion of migration is becoming a global trend and an ontological given. The article is devoted to the process of perception of migration as an existential threat to security. Migration appears to be a social construct based on beliefs about the insecurity of the cultural and civilizational essence of the destination States. The prerequisites for securitization of migration are: a) changes in international relations that lead to the emergence of new mi-gration corridors and an increase in return migration; b) a change in the internal political course of the destina-tion States aimed at protecting national interests and collective identity. The discursive formation translates up-dated interpretations of humanitarian knowledge, cultural narratives and social ideology, thereby stimulating social polarization and rejection of the “other” as “alien”. The perception of the threat of migration begins with a humanitarian culture of social existence, which is further reinforced by material factors: budget spending on migrants, a shrinking labor market, and an infrastructural burden. As a result, society, not the state, acts as a securitizing actor. Public ideology influences foreign policy strategy and migration policy. It defines the mean-ing and content of the discourse of power, which is interconnected with the discourse of migration and is condi-tioned by the demands of collective identity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Izluchenko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: