PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Sustainability3 citationsOpen Access

The Global Economic Model in Crisis: An Analysis of the Obstacles to the Sustainable Development Goals

View Full Paper
ASAndriy StavytskyyАДАндрій Длігач

Key Points

  • Economic growth is impeded by market saturation and high public debt, impacting sustainable development progress.
  • Findings indicate that geopolitical tensions disrupt supply chains, further challenging the achievement of sustainable development goals.
  • This analysis employs data from the World Bank and IMF, covering economic trends from 2005 to 2024 to explore barriers to SDG progress.
  • The results underscore the necessity for reevaluating the current economic model to enable effective sustainable development.

Abstract

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), established by the United Nations in 2015, aim to address global challenges like poverty, inequality, and climate change, yet only 17% of these goals are on track for 2030. This study investigates the geopolitical, economic, and technological barriers to SDG progress, focusing on the middle-income trap, trade regionalisation, and automation’s impacts. Using quantitative and qualitative methods, we analysed World Bank, IMF, UN, and OECD data (2005–2024) on GDP, FDI, exports, and public debt across various income-level countries. Findings reveal that economic growth is hindered by market saturation, ageing populations, high debt, and declining FDI, while global trade stagnation since 2011 and regionalisation impede cooperation. Automation reduces employment, shrinks the middle class, and threatens stability, with geopolitical tensions disrupting supply chains. The current economic model, reliant on consumption, investment, and exports, is insufficient for sustainable development. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated analysis of three structural global trends—trade stagnation, regionalisation, and automation—over the period 2005–2024. Unlike previous works that typically examine these factors in isolation or over shorter time horizons, our approach highlights their combined impact on SDG achievement. By formulating and testing specific hypotheses, the study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on how these interrelated processes jointly hinder sustainable development under the current global economic model.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Stavytskyy et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6d8548b2b6861e4c3e6a3https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198537
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets2019 · 3,793 citations
  2. 2The Sustainable Development Goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: a critical reflection on the SDGs from a socio-ecological perspective2020 · 421 citations
  3. 3Sustainable economic development and geopolitics: The role of energy trilemma policies2023 · 33 citations
  4. 4Sustainable development goal indicators: Analyzing trade-offs and complementarities2019 · 249 citations
  5. 5Are we on the right path to achieve the sustainable development goals?2019 · 407 citations