Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Long-term zero tillage practices showed 14-21% energy savings in rice-wheat systems, highlighting sustainability benefits.
The rice–wheat cropping system (RWCS) in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of India is a dominant food production model, but its conventional management practices, viz. , puddled transplanted rice (PTR) and conventionally tilled wheat (CTW), are highly energy-intensive, leading to excessive greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, lower energy use efficiency (EUE), and soil degradation. This 15-year field study, using a split–split plot design, evaluated the impact of various crop establishment methods on crop productivity, energy use, carbon indices, and GHG emissions under RWCS. Conservation agriculture (CA)-based practices such as zero-till direct-seeded rice (ZTDSR), dry-seeded rice (DSDSR), and zero-till wheat (ZTW) and wheat sown with a Turbo Happy Seeder with residue retention (THSW + R) were compared with conventional systems. The results showed that ZTDSR and THSW + R significantly reduced total input energy, fossil fuel use, and irrigation water demand, resulting in 14–21% energy savings compared to PTR-CTW systems. ZTDSR-THSW + R emerged as the most energy-efficient combination, recording the highest EUE (13.6) and the lowest system-specific grain energy (9.5 MJ kg −1 ), reducing global warming potential by over 50%. Despite slightly lower rice yields under ZTDSR, system productivity remained comparable due to superior wheat performance. Carbon output (8,907 kg C ha −1 ) and carbon efficiency ratio (11.43) were higher under CA-based treatments for wheat due to greater biomass returns and reduced carbon inputs (2,293 kg C ha −1 ). Integrating zero-till and residue management practices in RWCS enhances energy efficiency, improves sustainability metrics, and reduces environmental footprints. These findings support a transition from conventional to CA-based systems for climate-resilient, resource-efficient agriculture in the IGP and similar agroclimatic zones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chaudhary et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: