PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Frontiers in Public Health5 citationsOpen Access

Comprehensive evaluation of primary health care service capacity in China based on TOPSIS and RSR methods

View Full Paper
LWLing-Yi WangFLFurong LiSJShan Jiang

Key Points

  • The evaluation score of primary health care in China showed a steady increase, but efficiency declined over the years.
  • Analysis from 2009 to 2022 highlights improvements in health resource input, while health service efficiency decreases significantly.
  • A total of 14 indicators across three dimensions were analyzed using the TOPSIS and RSR methods for a comprehensive assessment.
  • Findings suggest a necessary shift towards enhancing operational efficiency and care quality in primary health care.

Abstract

Background Primary health institutions form the foundation of China’s three-tiered medical and health service system in both urban and rural settings, shouldering the critical role of delivering basic medical and healthcare services to the populace. Gaining insight into the capacity of primary health care services in China post the 2009 New Health Reform is of paramount importance for further safeguarding public health and advancing health equity. Methods Using national data from the China Health Statistics Yearbook from 2009 to 2022, we constructed an evaluation system with 14 indicators across three dimensions: health resource input, health service efficiency, and health service output. We employed an entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), Rank-Sum Ratio (RSR) method and fuzzy combination evaluation to objectively assess PHC capacity and its constituent parts. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the comprehensive ranking results. The data analysis was meticulously executed using the R4.4.2 software. Results The overall comprehensive evaluation score showed a general upward trend, peaking in 2022. However, dimensional analysis revealed a stark divergence: the “Health Resource Input” dimension improved steadily over the period, while the “Health Service Efficiency” dimension showed a clear declining trend, with the most efficient years being at the beginning of the study period. Conclusion China’s PHC capacity growth from 2009 to 2022 has been primarily driven by a massive expansion in resources, which masks a persistent and worrying decline in service efficiency. Our objective, multi-dimensional analysis reveals a critical need for a policy pivot from simple resource accumulation to strategic performance optimization. Future efforts must focus on improving the operational efficiency of existing assets and enhancing the quality of care to ensure sustainable and high-value primary health care for the population.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6d8978b2b6861e4c3ee3chttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1657961
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Digital health governance in China by a whole-of-society approach2025 · 13 citations
  2. 2Evaluating China's primary healthcare services' efficiency and spatial correlation: a three-stage DEA-Malmquist model2024 · 11 citations
  3. 3A Review of Healthcare Challenges in the UK and the US: Medical Errors, Aging, Private Healthcare and Governance2025 · 4 citations
  4. 4Evaluating the efficiency of primary health care institutions in China: an improved three-stage data envelopment analysis approach2023 · 26 citations
  5. 5Plant-microorganism combined remediation of polychlorinated naphthalenes contaminated soils based on molecular directed transformation and Taguchi experimental design-assisted dynamics simulation2020 · 44 citations