PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Frontiers in Immunology3 citationsOpen Access

Identification of anti-mouse PD-1 agonist antibodies that inhibit T cell activation

View Full Paper
LLLingling LiuSTSatoru TakashimaYTYosuke Tokumaru

Key Points

  • RMP1-30 exhibited enhanced agonist activity in T cells with elevated PD-1 expression, promoting their activation.
  • Characterization of various anti-mouse PD-1 antibodies identified RMP1–14 as both an agonist and blocking antibody.
  • Biological activity assessment of PD-1 antibodies indicates potential use in targeting T cell-mediated responses.
  • In vivo applications of these antibodies may depend on local Fc receptor availability and PD-1 expression dynamics.

Abstract

PD-1-stimulating agents have been projected to be unique immunosuppressants for the treatment of undesirable inflammatory conditions including autoimmune diseases. We recently characterized anti-human PD-1 (hPD-1) agonist antibodies, which showed a significant immunosuppressive effect in hPD-1 knock-in mice. However, the lack of anti-mouse PD-1 (mPD-1) agonist antibody has been a limitation in testing the efficacy of PD-1-targeted therapy using various disease models. To find mPD-1 agonist antibody, we assessed biological activities of commercial anti-mouse PD-1 mAb clones. Agonist activity was evident in RMP1-30, which did not block PD-1-PD-L1 interaction. In contrast, 29F.1A12 was the exceptionally strong blocking antibody. Interestingly, RMP1–14 was a dual-function antibody offering decent blocking activity and the agonist activity comparable to RMP1-30. In this assessment, PD-1 expression levels critically affected both blocking and agonist activities. T cells expressing PD-1 at higher levels were stronger responders in the agonist assay, while cells with lower PD-1 expression were more sensitive in detecting blocking activities. Considering physiologically-relevant PD-1 levels, RMP1–14 would substantially behave as a blocker in vivo consistent with its frequent use to enhance anti-tumor immunity. Taken together, RMP1–30 may be useful as mPD-1 agonist antibody although its in vivo efficacy may vary dependent on the local Fc receptor availability and PD-1 levels on target cells. It should be also noted that in vivo use of this rat IgG2b clone may require attention to the mechanism of immunosuppression that may involve PD-1 agonism and the depletion of PD-1-expressing effector cells.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Liu et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6d8ba8b2b6861e4c3efb1https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1631929
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 promotes immune evasion in tumors by facilitating the expression of programmed cell death-ligand 12024 · 44 citations
  2. 2IL-18 Induces PD-1–Dependent Immunosuppression in Cancer2011 · 365 citations
  3. 3PD-1 agonism by anti-CD80 inhibits T cell activation and alleviates autoimmunity2022 · 110 citations
  4. 4A Comparison of Murine PD-1 and PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibodies2022 · 25 citations
  5. 5Computational design of a synthetic PD-1 agonist2021 · 67 citations