PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Frontiers in Earth Science4 citationsOpen Access

Mechanism of the connection between sacred and secular space: settlement morphology characteristics in the multi-ethnic areas of the Gansu-Qinghai Plateau

View Full Paper
BJB JiangTJTao JiangJSJing Si

Key Points

  • Four key factors account for 78.549% of the total variation in settlement morphology.
  • Five typical settlement paradigms were identified, showing significant morphological differences based on culture and geography.
  • Sacred space influences settlement arrangement beyond ethnic differences, adapting to various secular factors.
  • The study proposes a 'spatial organization paradigm' for planning multi-ethnic heritage sites, highlighting community participation.

Abstract

Settlements in the Multi-ethnic Areas (SiMAs) of the Gansu-Qinghai Plateau reflect the long-term coordinated adaptation of rugged terrain, diverse ethnic cultures, and sacred beliefs, but rapid urbanization and secularization are threatening their spatial integrity. Based on a framework of 10 morphological indicators, this study conducted Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering analysis on 51 locals SiMAs to reveal the underlying spatial patterns. The results show that (1) four key factors—morphological cognition, structural order, traffic layout, and boundary shaping—greatly help explain the shape of SiMAs, accounting for 78.549% of the total variation. (2) This study identified five typical settlement space paradigms and listed six typical examples to support them. Ethnic settlements under different geographical environments and sacred beliefs have formed adaptive layouts with significant morphological differences. (3) Comparing different cases shows that sacred space, as a fundamental organizing idea, goes beyond ethnic differences to influence how settlements are arranged, while secular space changes and adapts based on various factors. The “spatial organization paradigm” proposed in this study clarifies how nature, culture, and functional drivers interweave to shape plateau settlements and provides a transferable practical path for community participation in conservation and sustainable planning of multi-ethnic mountain heritage sites around the world.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jiang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6d8ba8b2b6861e4c3f1a7https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1674493
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Typological characterisation and territorial distribution of traditional rural buildings in the Apulian territory (Italy)2019 · 38 citations
  2. 2The Theory and Localization About Typo-morphological Approach2017 · 11 citations
  3. 3URBAN MORPHOLOGY AND CONSERVATION PLANNING2010 · 6 citations
  4. 4CLUSTER ANALYSIS AND RELATED ISSUES1999 · 5 citations
  5. 5Urban cohesion vis-à-vis organic spatialization of “Third places” in Saudi Arabia: The need for an alternative planning praxis2020 · 13 citations