PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 20251 citationsOpen Access

Integration of aged brain multi-omics reveals cross-system mechanisms underlying Alzheimer's disease heterogeneity

View Full Paper
LSLucas P ScheidemantelKLKátia de Paiva LopesCGChris Gaiteri

Key Points

  • Integrated multi-omics analysis shows immune activity correlates significantly with Alzheimer's disease phenotypes.
  • The strongest factor linked to Alzheimer's involved elevated immune responses and disrupted energy metabolism.
  • Application of a multi-omic framework utilized data from 1,358 aging brain samples from two major studies.
  • Findings highlight potential biomarkers and targets for precision medicine in treating Alzheimer's disease.

Abstract

The molecular correlates of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are increasingly being defined by omics. Yet, the findings from different data types or cohorts are often difficult to reconcile. Collecting multiple omics from the same individuals allows a comprehensive view of disease-related molecular mechanisms, while addressing conflicting findings derived from single omics. Such same-sample multi-omics can reveal, for instance, when changes observed in the transcriptome share distinct but coordinated signals in epigenetics and proteomics, relationships otherwise unclear. Here, we apply a data-driven multi-omic framework to integrate epigenomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and cell-type-specific population data from up to 1,358 aged human brain samples from the Religious Orders Study (ROS) and Rush Memory and Aging Project (MAP). We demonstrate the existence of sprawling cross-omics cross-system biological factors that also relate to AD phenotypes. The strongest AD-associated factor (factor 8) involved elevated immune activity at the epigenetic level, decreased expression of heat shock genes in the transcriptome, and disrupted energy metabolism and cytoskeletal dynamics in the proteome. We also showed immune-related factors (factors 2 and 3) with discordant enrichments, reflecting reactive-like glial subpopulations and protective contributions from surveillance microglia. Both were negatively associated with AD pathology, suggesting potential immune resilience mechanisms. Finally, unsupervised clustering of participants revealed eleven molecular subtypes of the aging brain, including three clusters strongly associated with AD but displaying distinct molecular signatures and phenotypic characteristics. Our findings provide a comprehensive map of molecular mechanisms underlying AD heterogeneity, highlighting the complex role of neuroinflammatory processes, and yielding potential novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets for precision medicine approaches to AD treatment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Scheidemantel et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e0fc8b2b6861e4c3f65ehttps://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.678110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Brain high-throughput multi-omics data reveal molecular heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease2024 · 20 citations
  2. 2A comprehensive multi-omics analysis reveals unique signatures to predict Alzheimer’s disease2024 · 22 citations
  3. 3Aged brain multi-omic integration captures immunometabolic and sex variation2025
  4. 4Multi-ancestry studies in multi-omics of Alzheimer’s disease: Recent insights and future directions2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Leveraging multiomic approaches to elucidate mechanisms of heterogeneity in Alzheimer's disease: Neuropsychiatric symptoms, co‐pathologies, and sex differences2025