Comparative study reveals Ti150's higher burning velocity and critical oxygen pressure compared to TC11, indicating unique combustion mechanisms.
Ti150 has potential applications in aeroengine components. However, the lack of research on its flame resistance, combustion behavior, and mechanisms makes it difficult to assess the risk of “titanium fire” and leaves fire protection design without theoretical support. This study aimed to determine the combustion resistance of Ti150 and elucidate its combustion behavior and mechanisms to address these issues. Through comparative Promoted Ignition-Combustion (PIC) tests between Ti150 and TC11 alloys, microstructural characterization, and thermodynamic/kinetic analyses, the following conclusions were drawn. Ti150 alloy exhibited a higher critical oxygen pressure and a higher ignition temperature but a significantly faster burning velocity, compared with TC11 alloy. The relationship between pressure and ignition temperature was in good agreement with the modified Frank-Kamenetskii ignition model. The ignition activation energy of Ti150 alloy was determined to be 118.41 kJ/mol, which was approximately 21% higher than that of TC11 alloy (97.72 kJ/mol). Moreover, post-combustion microstructural observations of Ti150 alloy revealed a higher oxygen content in the melting zone and an enrichment of Zr at the solid–liquid interface, both of which contribute to the higher burning velocity of Ti150 alloy compared with TC11 alloy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zha et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: