Numerical simulations demonstrate that matching temperature ratio enhances film cooling effectiveness in engines, indicating improved performance alignment.
Adiabatic effectiveness (π) is a critical metric for evaluating film cooling performance. Most film cooling experiments are conducted under low-temperature and low-pressure laboratory conditions, which significantly differ from real engine environments. This raises ongoing debate about whether laboratory-measured π reliably reflects engine conditions. This study focused on low-speed film cooling over a flat plate. For engine conditions at low and high blowing ratios, the results of scaling π under engine-matched temperature ratio conditions (ππ =2.9) were compared with results under mismatched- ππ conditions (ππ =1.17) using a calibrated RANS turbulence model. Results showed that matching temperature ratio minimized discrepancies in π between laboratory and engine conditions, highlighting the importance of matching ππ in scaling film cooling performance. Further, the effect of varying temperature ratios on π was also investigated and a correlation for fan-shaped hole film cooling was proposed to correct laterally averaged effectiveness from laboratory conditions to engine conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: