PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 24, 2025Physical Review X5 citations

Two-Dopant Origin of Competing Stripe and Pair Formation in Hubbard and t−J Models

View Full Paper
TBTizian BlatzUSUlrich SchollwöckFGFabian Grusdt

Key Points

  • The analysis reveals that tightly bound dopant pairs and stripelike configurations coexist in the Hubbard model, influencing the spin environment.
  • Findings from density-matrix renormalization group simulations show competing stripe and pair formation at the single-pair level, crucial for understanding cuprate superconductors.
  • The study connects the Hubbard and t-J models, clarifying how the inclusion of the three-site hopping term affects the pairing properties of these systems.
  • This work suggests that the interplay of stripe order and uniform pairing arises fundamentally at the small-pair level, influencing overall superconducting properties.

Abstract

Understanding the physics of the two-dimensional Hubbard model is widely believed to be a key step in achieving a full understanding of high-Tc cuprate superconductors. In recent years, progress has been made by large-scale numerical simulations at finite doping and, on the other hand, by microscopic theories able to capture the physics of individual charge carriers. In this work, we study single pairs of dopants in a cylindrical system using the density-matrix renormalization group algorithm. We identify two coexisting charge configurations that couple to the spin environment in different ways: a tightly bound configuration featuring (next-)nearest-neighbor pairs and a stripelike configuration of dopants on opposite sides of the cylinder, accompanied by a spin domain wall. Thus, we establish that the interplay between stripe order and uniform pairing, central to the models’ phases at finite doping, has its origin at the single-pair level. By interpolating between the Hubbard and the related t−J model, we are able to quantitatively understand discrepancies in the pairing properties of the two models through the three-site hopping term usually omitted from the t−J Hamiltonian. This term is closely related to a next-nearest-neighbor tunneling t′, which we observe to upset the balance between the competing stripe and pair states on the two-dopant level.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Blatz et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d6e16f8b2b6861e4c4003bhttps://doi.org/10.1103/dpfl-12st
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper