Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The PTL-PRS method enhances model performance in underrepresented ancestries, suggesting improved accuracy without sensitive data.
Summary Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) are essential tools for predicting individual phenotypic risk but often lack accuracy in non-European ancestry groups. Transfer Learning for Polygenic Risk Scores (TL-PRS) addresses this challenge by leveraging European PRSs to improve prediction in underrepresented ancestries but requires privacy-sensitive individual-level data and has low computational efficiency. Therefore, we introduce PTL-PRS (Pseudovalidated Transfer Learning for PRS), an extension of TL-PRS that incorporates pseudovalidation to eliminate the need for individual-level data and includes further software optimization. For pseudovalidation, PTL-PRS generates pseudo-summary statistics for training and validation and evaluates model performance with the pseudo-R2 metric. To improve computational efficiency, PTL-PRS software was optimized with C ++, blockwise early stopping, and direct genotype retrieval. Overall, PTL-PRS enhances usability while maintaining TL-PRS’s predictive performance. Availability and Implementation The PTL.PRS R package is publicly available on GitHub at https://github.com/bokeumcho/PTL.PRS. The summary statistics used in this paper are available in the public domain: UK Biobank (https://pheweb.org/UKB-TOPMed), PGS Catalog (https://www.pgscatalog.org), COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (https://www.covid19hg.org) and GenOMICC (https://genomicc.org/data). Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: