Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large-scale comparative study shows distinct torsion distributions in crystal, vacuum, and solvent environments, indicating environmental effects on conformational ensembles.
Understanding the conformational ensemble of molecules in different environments is at the core of many research efforts. In conformer generation and geometry optimization, the complexity of the conformer space arises from the underlying torsion-angle distributions, which, in the case of force fields and some in silico conformer generators like ETKDG, are derived from accumulated torsion profiles for a predefined set of torsion motifs (termed "torsion motif angle distributions", TMADs). Comparative studies of conformer generation and global optimization algorithms often neglect that the TMADs are sensitive to the environment they are extracted from, leading to comparisons of conformational ensembles and minimum-energy conformations from e.g. crystal versus vacuum environments. Here, we present a large-scale comparative study of TMADs across different environments, namely crystal, vacuum, water, and hexane. Our results show that the effects in the different environments, such as solvent-solute interactions in water and hexane, and packing effect in the crystal, produce strikingly distinct torsion distributions for most of the selected torsion motifs. In addition to qualitative and quantitative comparison of the extracted TMADs, we also provide an automated fitting procedure that allows rapid parameterization of the distributions. These newly found parameters can be employed in a solvent-specific conformer generation procedure in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: