Mixed-methods study explores clinical governance's impact on patient safety and healthcare quality in public hospitals.
Safeguarding patient and personnel safety and improving care quality has emerged as a critical priority for healthcare systems globally. In response to persistent challenges in healthcare delivery, many countries have adopted clinical governance frameworks and organisational learning processes to strengthen accountability and promote continuous improvement. Robust clinical governance frameworks provide the processes and accountability measures necessary to foster a culture of knowledge-sharing and evidence-based decision-making, all of which are key characteristics of a learning organisation. This study seeks to investigate the role of clinical governance in improving hospital performance through three interconnected sub-studies. The first sub-study will explore how non-clinical managers in selected public sector hospitals leverage clinical governance to improve hospital performance. The second sub-study will evaluate the impact of clinical governance interventions on clinical outcomes and identify opportunities for organisational learning within these hospitals. The third sub-study will serve as an embedded experimental component, monitoring changes in complaint resolution indicators before and after interventions to assess improvements in clinical governance through both intra- and inter-hospital comparisons. Qualitative data will be analysed using NVivo version 15, with inductive thematic analysis employed to uncover emergent patterns and interpretive themes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maake et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: