Analysis reveals lignite's mechanical response varies with strain rate during static and dynamic loading, indicating distinct failure mechanisms.
Coal seams, as critical components of open-pit mine slopes, are subjected to both quasi-static and dynamic loading disturbances during mining operations, with their mechanical properties directly influencing the slope stability. Consequently, to clarify the mechanical properties and failure mechanisms of coal seams affected by the strain rate under the static–dynamic loading conditions, the mineral composition and meso-structural characteristics of lignite were analyzed in this study, and uniaxial compression tests with different quasi-static loading rates and dynamic compression tests with different impact velocities were conducted. The results indicate that there is an obvious horizontal bedding structure in lignite, which leads to differences in mechanical response and failure mechanism at different strain rates. Under the quasi-static loading, lignite exhibits significantly lower strain-rate sensitivity than compared to dynamic impact conditions. The Poisson’s ratio difference between the bedding matrix and the lignite will produce interfacial friction, which gradually decreases with the increase in the distance from the interface, thus promoting the transformation of lignite from multi-crack tensile shear mixed fracture to single-crack splitting failure. Under the dynamic impact conditions, low-impact velocities induce stress wave reflection at bedding interfaces due to wave impedance disparity between the matrix and lignite, generating tensile strains that result in bedding-plane delamination failure; at higher velocities, incomplete energy absorption by the rock specimen leads to fragmentation failure of lignite. These findings are of great significance for the stability analysis of open-pit slopes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: