PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2025Agronomy16 citationsOpen Access

A Systematic Review of Modeling and Control Approaches for Path Tracking in Unmanned Agricultural Ground Vehicles

View Full Paper
YZYafei ZhangHLHui LiuYSYuying Shen

Key Points

  • Path-tracking control is vital for ensuring stability and accuracy in unmanned agricultural ground vehicles, highlighting its importance in precision agriculture.
  • The review categorizes modeling approaches into geometric, kinematic, and dynamic models, addressing the complexities faced in agricultural environments and terrain.
  • Commonly used path-tracking strategies include PID control, model predictive control, and learning-based approaches, focusing on their theoretical frameworks and real-world applicability.
  • Major challenges identified include slip compensation, terrain-adaptive modeling, and real-time system implementation, emphasizing the need for advanced methodologies in dynamic settings.

Abstract

With the advancement of precision agriculture, the autonomous navigation of unmanned agricultural ground vehicles (UAGVs) has emerged as a critical research topic. As a fundamental component of autonomous navigation, path-tracking control is essential for ensuring the accurate and stable operation of UAGVs. However, achieving high-precision and robust tracking in agricultural environments remains challenging due to unstructured terrain, variable wheel slip, and complex dynamic disturbances. This review provides a structured and comprehensive survey of modeling and control methodologies for UAGVs, with particular emphasis on control-theoretic formulations and their applicability across diverse agricultural scenarios. In contrast to prior reviews, the modeling approaches are systematically classified into geometric, kinematic, and dynamic models, including extended formulations that incorporate wheel slip and external disturbances. Furthermore, this paper systematically reviews commonly adopted path-tracking strategies for UAGVs, including proportional–integral–derivative (PID) control, pure pursuit (PP), Stanley control, sliding mode control (SMC), model predictive control (MPC), and learning-based approaches. Emphasis is placed on their theoretical underpinnings, tracking accuracy, adaptability to unstructured field environments, and computational efficiency. In addition, several key technical challenges are identified, such as terrain-adaptive vehicle modeling, slip compensation mechanisms, real-time implementation under hardware constraints, and the cooperative control of multiple UAGVs operating in dynamic agricultural scenarios. By presenting a detailed review from a control-centric perspective, this study aims to serve as a valuable reference for researchers and practitioners developing intelligent agricultural vehicle systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7be6ceebfec0fc52382cahttps://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102274
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Method of controlling tillage depth for agricultural tractors considering engine load characteristics2023 · 58 citations
  2. 2Adaptive Fuzzy Sliding Mode-Based Steering Control of Agricultural Tracked Robot2019 · 2 citations
  3. 3Preprocessing method of night vision image application in apple harvesting robot2018 · 32 citations
  4. 4Development and experiments on reel with improved tine trajectory for harvesting oilseed rape2021 · 34 citations
  5. 5An Adaptive Observer approach to Slip Estimation for Agricultural Tracked Vehicles2021 · 6 citations