Prospective crossover study assesses speech intelligibility and real-ear gain in moderate hearing loss patients, indicating no significant differences with M&RIE.
Background: The microphone & receiver-in-ear (M&RIE) integrates two traditional hearing aid microphones, while an additional in-ear microphone helps preserve natural sound perception. However, the impact of this third microphone on hearing aid amplification remains unclear in patients with moderate hearing loss. Methods: In this prospective crossover study, thirty-nine participants with moderate hearing loss and no prior hearing-aid use were randomly assigned to be sequentially fitted with both traditional and M&RIE receivers. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit (APHAB) and word recognition score (WRS) were assessed. Audiological amplification was evaluated using real-ear measurements to determine whether a third in-ear microphone limits real-ear gain. Results: WRSs and APHAB scores showed no significant differences between the standard and M&RIE receivers. In addition, real-ear measurements across all frequencies and earplug types revealed no significant differences in real-ear insertion gain between the two receivers at a conversational level (65 dB SPL). Conclusions: The M&RIE provides amplification comparable to that of the standard receiver while preserving natural sound cues without significant audiological disadvantages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kwak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: