Analysis reveals differing international stances on Gaza and Ukraine, suggesting a double standard in human rights enforcement.
Anyone who looks at the international laws that have established the rights of humans to life and freedoms will be amazed at the international positions towards two different crises. The researcher looks forward to finding one approach in the international stance and behaviour in dealing with two crises but when you look at each crisis carefully , you will find obvious considerable differences in the international stances. This intersects with the principles upon which the United Nations institutions were built with regards to defending the rights and liberties as well as attaining equality before the international law in addition to preventing injustice , persecution and genocides. It is noted that the international stances towards Ukraine in its war against the Russian occupation differes radically from those towards the Palestinians in defending its rights. The international community stands firmly with Ukraine because the West doesn't accept any occupation and transgressions, as a result Putin has been described as Hitler whereas in Palestine, this right is given to Israeli occupier to do whatever he likes and Israel is protected by the right of veto which prevents any international resolution against the Zionist entity . This gives clear idea about the international double standard approach concerning the international crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Assist.Prof. Rahman Abd-al-Hussain Dhahir (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: