Assessment of stakeholder perceptions and technical needs for flexibility markets, highlighting key barriers to adoption.
The transition of electric systems from a centralized, fossil-based model toward a decentralized, renewable-powered architecture is reshaping the way electricity is generated, managed and consumed. As distributed energy resources (DERs) proliferate, grid management becomes increasingly complex, especially at the distribution level. In this context, flexibility emerges as a key enabler for more stable and efficient grid operation, while also facilitating greater integration of DER and supporting the electrification of energy demand. Local flexibility markets (LFMs) are gaining importance as structured mechanisms that allow grid operators to procure flexibility services from prosumers, aggregators and other actors. However, to ensure widespread participation, it is essential to develop digital tools that accommodate users of different profiles, regardless of their size, technical background or market experience. The REEFLEX project addresses this challenge by designing and developing 14 interoperable flexibility tools tailored to diverse stakeholder needs. To ensure that these tools are aligned with real market conditions and user expectations, REEFLEX conducted extensive stakeholder-centric surveys. This paper presents the methodology and key findings of those surveys, providing insights into user perceptions, technical requirements and adoption barriers. Results are contextualized within existing literature and other funded initiatives, highlighting implications for the design of inclusive and scalable flexibility markets.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernández et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Applied Sciences