Literature analysis shows suturing supports healing in complex cases, suggesting alternatives for simpler procedures.
Research objective: To evaluate the necessity and effectiveness of suturing in oral surgery procedures, particularly tooth extractions, by analyzing when sutures support healing and when a sutureless approach may be preferable. Methodology: A literature-based analysis of clinical outcomes associated with both sutured and sutureless wound closure methods in oral surgery, with consideration of procedural complexity, anatomical location, and patient-related factors. Main conclusions: Suturing can promote hemostasis and protect the surgical site, especially in complex cases or when there is a risk of dehiscence. However, in uncomplicated extractions, omitting sutures may result in faster healing and reduced postoperative discomfort. The decision should be made on a case-by-case basis. Application of the study: This review supports clinicians in making informed, individualized decisions regarding wound closure techniques in oral surgery, aiming to optimize healing and patient comfort. Originality/Novelty of the study: The paper challenges the traditional assumption that suturing is always beneficial, offering a nuanced perspective that considers both clinical indicators and patient experience to guide treatment decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcinkiewicz et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: