Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper demonstrates improved reasoning in laboratory safety education knowledge graphs using contrastive learning and neural-symbolic features.
Aiming at the limitation that the laboratory safety education knowledge graph (KG) lacks the ability to mine symbolic rules and is difficult to reason about the implicit relationships in the KG, this paper first represents the entities and relations in the laboratory safety education KG, and then designs neural network encoding and symbolic rule encoding to extract neural-symbolic features, respectively. Contrastive learning technology is used to project the neural network knowledge embedding and symbolic rule knowledge embedding of the same sample into the same vector space, and to bring the same samples closer and push the different samples further apart in the same vector space, achieving further fusion of neural-symbolic features. Experimental results show that the MRR of the proposed model is 0.956, which is better than the comparative model, proving that the model has excellent performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanling Liu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: