PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2025Infrastructures3 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Assessment of Seismic Damping Scheme for Multi-Storey Frame Structures

View Full Paper
SJShuming JiaPMPengfei Ma

Key Points

  • Damping schemes using energy dissipation technology effectively reduce seismic response in structures.
  • Storey shear reductions of 15-30% and inter-storey drift reductions of 19-28% were achieved through strategic damper placement.
  • Parametric investigation employed finite element modeling with ETABS to analyze the influence of damper arrangements.
  • Perimeter distribution damping outperformed other spatial configurations, indicating critical considerations for seismic design.

Abstract

Traditional anti-seismic methods are constrained by high construction costs and the potential for severe structural damage under earthquakes. Energy dissipation technology provides an effective solution for structural earthquake resistance by incorporating energy-dissipating devices within structures to actively absorb seismic energy. However, existing research lacks in-depth analysis of the influence of energy dissipation devices’ placement on structural dynamic response. Therefore, this study investigates the seismic mitigation effectiveness of viscous dampers in multi-storey frame structures and their optimal placement strategies. A comprehensive parametric investigation was conducted using a representative three-storey steel-frame kindergarten facility in Shandong Province as the prototype structure. Advanced finite element modeling was implemented through ETABS software to establish a high-fidelity structural analysis framework. Based on the supplemental virtual damping ratio seismic design method, damping schemes were designed, and the influence patterns of different viscous damper arrangement schemes on the seismic mitigation effectiveness of multi-storey frame structures were systematically investigated. Through rigorous comparative assessment of dynamic response characteristics and energy dissipation mechanisms inherent to three distinct energy dissipation device deployment strategies (perimeter distribution, central concentration, and upper-storey localization), this investigation delineates the governing principles underlying spatial positioning effects on structural seismic mitigation performance. This comprehensive investigation elucidates several pivotal findings: damping schemes developed through the supplemental virtual damping ratio-based design methodology demonstrate excellent applicability and predictive accuracy. All three spatial configurations effectively attenuate structural seismic response, achieving storey shear reductions of 15–30% and inter-storey drift reductions of 19–28%. Damper spatial positioning critically influences mitigation performance, with perimeter distribution outperforming central concentration, while upper-storey localization exhibits optimal overall effectiveness. These findings validate the engineering viability and structural reliability of viscous dampers in multi-storey frame applications, establishing a robust scientific foundation for energy dissipation technology implementation in seismic design practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jia et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7cc66eebfec0fc5238aa8https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures10100258
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimizing Viscous Damper Placement for Stochastic Performance of Buildings with Plan Asymmetry2024 · 12 citations
  2. 2Assessment of the degree of building damage caused by the 2010 Yushu, China earthquake using satellite and airborne data2011 · 8 citations
  3. 3A displacement-based seismic design method for building structures with nonlinear viscoelastic dampers2021 · 31 citations
  4. 4Expected seismic response and annual seismic loss of viscously damped braced steel frames2024 · 10 citations
  5. 5Reduced-order model for RBDO of multiple TMDs on eccentric L-shaped buildings subjected to seismic excitations2023 · 21 citations