Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This commentary explores the role of artificial intelligence in logopedics and scientific revolutions, suggesting potential limitations.
This comment grew out of a talk given at the 2025 National Center for Voice and Speech conference entitled "Voice and Speech in the Age of Machine Learning." Logopedics, phoniatrics, and vocology will all benefit from artificial intelligence with reduced time and effort in clinical management and improved research protocols. With that benefit, however, comes a concern about future scientific revolutions that are born with human intelligence, thinking about anomalies in data sets that can easily be overlooked by algorithmic approaches. This paper reviews the classic thinking of Thomas Kuhn on scientific revolutions in the middle of the twentieth century and philosophic contribution in the twenty-first century by Wissner-Gross and Freer about intelligence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ingo R. Titze (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: