PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 27, 2025Journal of Robotic Surgery15 citationsOpen Access

Force in robotic thoracic surgery –a one year analysis of DaVinci 5 force feedback

View Full Paper
PKPeter J. KneuertzRMRobert MostellarRMRobert E. Merritt

Key Points

  • Integration of force feedback technology reduces average instrument forces during robotic thoracic surgeries.
  • Mean forces during lung resections were significantly lower than those for esophageal and mediastinal procedures (p < 0.001).
  • Data from 444 robotic surgeries across 73 surgeons were analyzed to assess the impact of force feedback on performance.
  • Higher force settings correlate with reduced instrument forces, indicating potential benefits for surgical precision.

Abstract

Abstract Lack of tactile sensation has been a limitation of robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS). The da Vinci 5 System (launched in 2024) integrates force feedback (FFB), a technology that measures instrument-tip forces and relays them to console hand controllers. This study characterizes forces applied during RATS and evaluates the impact of FFB. Da Vinci 5 system data for all RATS procedures using FFB instruments performed in the US between March 29, 2024 and April 30, 2025 were reviewed. Common thoracic surgeries were analyzed, including lung resections, mediastinal, esophageal, and diaphragmatic procedures. Mean instrument-tip forces (Newtons, N) were compared by procedure and instrument type. Forces and time spent above > 6.5 N were compared across FFB settings. Data from 444 procedures by 73 unique surgeons were analyzed. Median forces during lung resections (1.45 N anatomic resection, 1.42 N wedge) were significantly lower compared to mediastinal procedures (1.61 N), esophageal (1.74 N), and diaphragm surgery (1.59 N) ( p 6.5 N similarly declined with increased FFB setting ( p < 0.001). FFB technology is associated with reduced average and peak instrument forces during RATS, particularly at medium and high settings. Retraction instruments experienced the highest forces. Further research is needed to define optimal force thresholds and clinical impact.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kneuertz et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68d7e84439bbb06045426b52https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02781-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Vision-Based Suture Tensile Force Estimation in Robotic Surgery2020 · 38 citations
  2. 2Force-based assessment of tissue handling skills in simulation training for robot-assisted surgery2023 · 19 citations
  3. 3Haptic Feedback, Force Feedback, and Force-Sensing in Simulation Training for Laparoscopy: A Systematic Overview2018 · 117 citations
  4. 4Defining the learning curve of robotic thoracic surgery: what does it take?2019 · 63 citations
  5. 5An Internet of Vehicles (IoV) Access Gateway Design Considering the Efficiency of the In-Vehicle Ethernet Backbone2020 · 40 citations