Analysis reveals competitive exclusion restricts morphological diversity in passeroid songbirds, suggesting ecological constraints.
Understanding why some viable body forms never evolve can reveal how ecological and evolutionary forces shape biodiversity. We investigate this question in the Passeroidea, a large group of songbirds, by analyzing their morphological trait space using topological data analysis and ancestral state reconstruction. We identify a long-standing morphological gap densely surrounded by extant species but unoccupied throughout passeroid diversification. The gap patterns deviate from neutral expectations and show no evidence of past occupation, rendering neutral evolution and extinction unlikely. Similar morphologies exist in other bird lineages, ruling out intrinsic constraints or niche absence. Geographic distributions and traits of passeroids versus non-passeroid gap occupants point to competitive exclusion as the plausible explanation: early-colonizing territorial specialists outside the Passeroidea may have preemptively occupied key habitats, limiting evolutionary opportunities for later-arriving lineages. We demonstrate how historical contingency can shape macroevolutionary outcomes, and introduce a generalizable framework for investigating structural gaps in trait evolution.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chia et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: